In Shakespeare’s play, “Titus
Andronicus,” the character Titus appeared to resonate with me the most because
he showed the most growth in the play. In the beginning of the play Titus, a
Roman general stands firmly by his country and his newly crowd emperor so much
that he slays one of his own sons because he goes against emperor, when the
emperor announces he wants to marry Titus’s daughter, who is already promised
to the emperor’s younger brother and Titus’s sons stand by their sister when
they help her run-off with the emperor’s younger brother. One of the brothers,
who decide to stay behind blocking the door so the others have time to escape,
is slain by their very own father because Titus views their action as treasonous.
It
is at this point of the play that Titus appears as this very cold, stern Roman
general, who values his country more than his own family. It is completely
obvious that Titus is willing to sacrifice his own family for the sakes of
Rome. Shakespeare makes this aware to the reader in the first act of the play
because it is here, Titus is returning from battle to bury twenty-five of his
own sons. Titus appears to show no remorse that he has lost twenty-five of us
own children in battle but appears proud for having sons die in battle for
their country.
Near
the end of the play after, Titus has had two more sons slain because they are
frame for murdering the emperor’s younger brother; I start to see Titus grow as
a character. I start to see Titus evolve into more of a caring father, who
cares for the well-being of his children because before his sons are executed
he is trick into cutting off his own hand in exchange for both of the lives of
his sons. It is at this point in the play that my feelings for Titus change
completely because no longer is he willing to sacrifice his children for the
sake’s of Rome but he is willing to sacrifice himself for his children.
At
the end of the play, when he kills his only daughter because she has been
raped, I still view Titus’s character as remorseful because he doesn’t want her
to go through life carrying her shame. The idea of Titus killing his only daughter
is viewed as unkind but I can understand the reason behind his action. Titus
even goes as far as to ask the emperor was it well done for Virginius, a Roman
centurion who also killed his raped daughter. The emperor agrees that it was
well done because as long as the girl lives, she bares the shame of the rape
and her father will feel sorrow for his daughter for the rest of her life. At
this point in the play, I view Titus as more as a sympathetic father, who even
tries to rationalize his reason for killing his daughter because of the questions
he posed to the emperor about Virginius. It is also at this point that I see
Titus character as fully evolved from the cold, stern Roman general to the
caring, sympathetic father because Titus is no longer allowing his children to
be killed as a sacrifice but he kills his own child out of mercy.
Titus seemed to grow and understand the fault in blind loyalty. Right before his very eyes he watch the destruction of what he fought so hard for all his life. 21 sons were lost to the cause of Rome and i feel that near the end he saw that this was not the Rome blood was shed for. His virtue was being a man of the laws man who does that is right in the eyes of society. this is not the man he died as
ReplyDelete